Windows Live space

On Behalf of Melanie Victoria LeBaron, in Propria Persona.
Portland Oregon, [97233]

DHS Legal Department –
C/O Jennifer Heldt
Social Service Specialist
Rockwood CW
CPS Unit

Munltinomah County, District 2
3552 SE 122nd Ave.
Portland Oregon, 97236

I, Melanie LeBaron, do herby respectfully ask Jennifer Heldt to recuse as CPS Advocate for the case she assigned to herself seeking my offspring, Victoria Couvillion, as a Client, pursuant to the Substantive Due Process rights. Assigning the case is ‘judicial in its nature’ and my daughter and I have a right to and independent judiciary, as it is written in the Declaration of Independence. Remaining on the case as the assessor, or Advocate, is in violation of Victoria’s Counsel of Choice, which I assert for her now by asking that Jennifer Heldt recuse as a CPS Agent, as my mom, Victoria’s grandmother, has objected prior. I also respectfully request to STRIKE her notes and to QUASH the current report form her case file. I also respectfully demand that all matters linked to Polk County Circuit Court, Petition III, MELANIE V. LEBARON, a Child, 7163-J, be QUASHED, since Supreme Court rule prohibits prejudice as Probable Cause to become a Premise for court action and Matt L. Hawkins, subjected Melanie to prejudice questions, regarding a book her read. There was no emergency there like there is no emergency here today.
Since the American Inalienable rights include an independent judiciary, which means CPS Agents do not get to assess upon performing judicial duties just prior to the assessment for the same case, pursuant to Judge Horner saying “The Courts are not an investigative body”, O5P2064 & O5P2176, Polk County Circuit Court, Child Custody Case, Singleton VS. LeBaron. I will expect Jennifer Heldt, while acting in the capacity as CPS Agent and judge, not to knock on my door, my address in Portland Oregon, [97233], again. I, nor my daughter, authorize Jennifer Heldt to Attest in open court or DHS staff meetings or otherwise submit judicial reports for either me or my daughter based on BEST INTERESTS, especially if pursuant to any Polk County Adjudication, since REASONABLE EFFORTS should not subvert our American Declaration of Independence, adjacent to the fact that Chandra Snyder has acted as judge and prosecutor in the same violations enumerated in this MOTION TO QUASH POLK COUNTY. Furthermore, multiple violations of the right to a SPEEDY TRIAL, compounded by conflicts of interests circumvent both the Oregon and the US Constitution. Therefore pursuant to the Inalienable Right, I do not authorize CPS agents to act outside their limitations, for any purpose, especially for that of a Municipal Contract sought under mass duress upon the American population, who, legally illiterate have not pre disposition to notice, not having any legal training in Contractual Law… Due to the American population being in ignorance ‘We the People’, have not considered our Legal and Natural Rights before we agreed to assign them to the DMV or abandon them therein, and since the ‘Municipal as well as the Administrative systems’ include noncriminal prosecution, wherein there is no justice sought, ‘Life’ is considered with too little regard. Thereto ‘Liberty’ and ‘The Pursuit of Happiness’ provide America with equal opportunity, which includes the right to ‘Life’, and said phrase provides a remedy for that which being Administrative, subject to contractual agreements and contractual law, causes the phrase, ‘Ignorance is no excuse’ to be irrelevant, which pertains to Criminal Justice System, leaving noncrime and lots of nonpunishment to inspire the disintegrated phrase, ‘Legal Illiteracy Is The Excuse For Such a Power Position’, and collusion. ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGES, have ignored their Oath of Office, to subvert our Sovereign status before God. Our public education system, our government is at fault for not Fully Advising the ‘sheep’ like people they dominate, when enforcing ORS as the Supreme Law of the Land, then say, “You get no Lawyer, or Privileged relationships”, and call it BEST INTERESTS when the CPS come to take our kids, who are worth more that $20.00 dollars, in any century. When in opposite, ‘Sometime this Century’ the power of the parent’s pen had been devaluated. It’s like having a pseudo religious leader, when compared to Webster’s Dictionary definition of the context of the word Religion, ‘A mans way of life’, which is also covered in the laws that govern the protection of diversified cultures everywhere, even while commercialization of that which was forbidden by the Holy Book used to define licensed religion, today. Yet, while considering, all the diversity, Sovereignty is not included as a venue or jurisdiction easily, even before we are born, considering Roe vs. Wade and the assign of the Power of Attorney to abortion clinics authorized by the Health Departments agreements, including them as a pseudo Law Firm, which retains nurses and clerks to advise children to exercise Power, assigned by partial emancipation practices, to their inexperienced use of the pen without the supervision of parents, and all accountability thereto nullified for abortionists. But, in opposite a child cannot get their ears pierced without accountability to the licensee, which is a conflict of the applications of laws, wherein legislature has failed us, which does not promote respect for religious leadership in the home, or allow for the protection of the unborn not being included in the phrase ‘We the People’.
Since ‘We the People’, have the right to equal protection of the laws, I insist that an assessment is the equivalent to and investigation due to the nature of CPS ‘representation’ being prosecutory and in violation of the Separation of Powers, at noncriminal Administrative rule, whereas the Oregon State Bar has denied that Max R. Wall is subject to a PRC violation, in the instance when he Attested the DHS Fully Advised Melanie LeBaron. Thereto, the Office of Noncriminal Prosecutor is one step off that which defines Representation, as when compared to the role of the Criminal Prosecutor, who directly representing the victim, as well as the voice of the people, which left Melanie LeBaron without Counsel subject to the full protection of Max R. Wall’s license agreement. Whereas the State of Oregon’s Agency claimed to have been assailed because of a dead bolt and a call to the State Police, when a call was logged to complain about Chandra Snyder circumventing the OAR, which is equivalent of overturning a judge if he said there is no case and the DA went to trial anyway, getting another judge to see where his Probable Cause had aim, and the other judge missed the mark, without any new and relevant information, considering the compounded violation of he right to a Speedy Trial & the No Teeth Factor. But, Max R. Wall is not handed to prosecute the voice of the State of Oregon, unless it is the victim and can be named the damaged party, like in the case assigned to Mark Allen Heslinga, where Max R. Wall had no jurisdiction over the criminal allegation. He is left to represent the voice of the DHS, which represents the will of the DMV, and what DHS give as Legal Advise to a teen in the form of a prognosis, so he just misses the responsibility of naming a victim the obligation to give Proper Counsel, while gaining from the lack thereof. Which is convoluted since Judge Horner did appoint Melanie a law firm, at first. But, I wonder why DHS is not held to accountability to Fully Advise their clients regarding all the aspects of the Supreme Law of the Land pertaining to a second set of double CONTINUANCES, when getting a Child’s nod to allow it. But, Fully Advisement on the Premise is insufficient as to omit Full Advisement of how the disregard to the right to a Speedy Trial, would adversely affect her the rest of her life, considering, Max R. Wall intended to prophesy her mother would hurt the unborn at the upcoming Trial. As directly thereto, Melanie’s voice was not represented, or preserved or even sought, neither her right to establish a home with the parent of her choice. So I wonder, were the pharmaceutical companies profit margins are or the overly protected CPS Caseworker, which not the voice of grass roots ambition, are identified as the voice of the people, in the Office of the DA, Max R. Wall’s action for suit in this case? If so, how was that also representing the ‘a Child’s needs, if not the grass root right, as Melanie herself would have to declare she believed her mother might assail a bureaucrat, where there was no contact between them, and be invited to meetings with Supervisory Staff and her CPS Advocate, which was not the case. Where is it documented that Melanie was invited to and extra clinical diagnosis session? And were in any case studies has the clinician treated one patient to resolve the propensity for criminal activity in another subject not in his care, while never examining the diagnosed? It is illegal to prosecute and represent, too, especially the accused when your action is directed at somebody else. Moreover, where DHS/CPS Agents are not members of the Oregon State Bar or Medical Doctors not having privilege in either capacity, do give Medical Advise while failing give the proper Legal Advise, when not qualified in either capacity to report Melanie to have been Fully Advised on the Premise, to which Max R. Wall attested. Since Melanie was not his Client, congruent, to the standard practice not to represent the Client of another law firm to say, by second hand, Full Advise was given, making the DHS Agency his Client, and the damaged party, and Melanie their damaged property, intended for the prosecutory action, since DHS is licensed to Advise anybody, especially when there was a conflict of interest between the CPS and the child, as well as with the mother, who had no Privilege, both being under duress. Thereto, Melanie had no Privilege with them either, they never asked. Max R. Wall was not Melanie’s Defender in the case were there was a conflict of interest between Melanie and Chandra Snyder, at the beginning, which is centered around the right to freedom of religion. And by such, like as in this case, Chandra Snyder, DHS Supervisory Staff, did so perform judicial duties, and also act in the capacity of prosecutor by signing the Petition she presented to Polk County Circuit Court after she had circumvented the Probable Cause stage of the American Due Process rights and assigned the case after it had already been closed a screening. When later, in half of Max R. Wall’s duties, did overturn the assigned caseworkers intention to allow visitation and prevented visitation on behalf of her own malicious allegation, that there was a physical confrontation initiated against her in court by Marilyn LeBaron, when in fact it was initiated by herself when she seized the signature pages of the AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS, which is perjury and prejudice. It should not remain unheard that the judge is bias to take the side of a bureaucrat, without inquiry, after Max R. Wall had gained a unfair advantage, prior, seeking a second set of double CONTINUANCES over the matter considering court had not been called to order, and people were still sitting down. What happened is in no way evidence someone would be attacked, especially the protected expectant mother, who with DHS diagnosis her protection sought through improper channels. Max R. Wall’s slanderous intentions are misapplied a bureaucratic protection suit, and not relevant to the Mother in absence of a history of violence on the intended felons part, which was over the same caseworker Chandra Snyder had personally assigned to the case to prior, which impeaches her, beforehand, considering the history of the Exhibits and when they got ‘mailed funny’ and when the began to get ‘mailed even funnier’. In conclusion, Marry Anne E. Miller was Max R. Wall’s Client in Fact, but the Oath of Affirmation would fall under Mark Allen Heslinga’s call, if he would dare retain a Client before the actual damaged party presented her self seeking justice. Melanie LeBaron was not represented on any count with respect to either the MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE or the MOTION FOR TELEPHONIC TESTIMONEY since she could not have been damaged by the Premise because the timeline of Exhibits would not be congruent to contact by and between her mother for CPS to present an assessment of the same. Marilyn LeBaron was not represented, as she had no physical contact with CPS or DHS Supervisory Staff which could be considered a clinical evaluation pursuant to any Exhibit purported as support of said MOTIONS.
Please ask the question, if you ever examine, the preponderance of evidence, “Is there such a thing as extra judicial testimony, like unto the equivalent of extra judicial evidence?” which goes to Judge Avera and the possibility that he has credentials in psychology, which is used like a ‘Wild Card’ in place of holy knowledge of future happenings. Only after you weigh in the fact that, if Melanie would have been properly appointed Counsel of Choice, as she did request it from her caseworker many times, and Chandra Snyder would not have sized her right to the security of her papers, the request for proper representation would have been validated, and could have been honored, or the case DISMISSED because it is illegal to proceed without Proper Representation, and grounds for the CONTINUANCE requested by Charles Douglas Berg, would have firmly been established, considering no one should have to give up there right to a Fair Trial no matter how many CONTINUANCES are granted. Next, and including the fact that Marilyn LeBaron’s pen was impeached of Power, but if not, Judge Avera would have been forced to allow a CONTINUANCE so Melanie could get the Lawyer or Attorney she requested early in her detainment while in Coos Bay instead of CASA. Next to the fact that you consider REASONABLE EFFORTS circumvents the Fifth and Sixth Amendment, in that a parent has no Privilege (Attorney Client Privilege with a bureaucrat), but if they don’t show up to CPS ordered meetings a parent loses by default, which points to a sanctioned preset disposition a the judicial level even while there is a violation of the Separation of Powers in the OAR when a CPS Supervisor can overturn a case closed at screening, a violation of Canon, since CPS Agents exercise judicial powers, too, but, of course, not Judge Avera’s responsibility, not here at least. But, what about the rest of it, shall we just call it Sanctioned Judicial Discretion? Because, allowing the CONTINUANCE, and Fully Advisement from Counsel of Choice for Melanie could have resulted in the exercise of her right to a Speedy Trial and could have got the AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS empowered, as Marilyn LeBaron did the criminal charges against herself resultant of act of resisting Chandra Snyder’s prejudice power position citing a judge, who finally did recuse, though not until a licensed attorney finally demanded it of him. But, no Attorney was appointed to Melanie, which unconscionable as well as illegal, whereas a conflict of interest between her and Chandra Snyder existed at the earliest stage of her case, while ignoring her Clients will and severing her from that which is the conscience of men, her faith in God, which is not Proper Representation. Being that said case was closed at screening on November 14th, 2005 and then having the same, Chandra Snyder, who impeachable, did act as judge and co-prosecutor by both assigning the case and then presenting it after she herself got a different screener when assigning the case, circumventing the probable cause stage of this case, when intending to get in the middle of all that was already being done imposing CPS Activity, in lieu of honoring the parent’s efforts, which was omitted in all the reports, and is not Proper Representation either, sending the message with her Supervisory Capacity, that only a bureaucrat can approve how a family sorts out their private matters and nothing a citizen does is good enough until DHS puts their stamp of approval on it. Prejudice should not over run Privilege, while relieving the parent of their child and imposing compliance tactics, Social Pressure as a Service with police force against the Fifth Amendment right, and later also stepping in as caseworker, too, while adlibbing about the passions of the child, in that Melanie was the ‘a Client’ of the other caseworker, who was denied the power to allow reconciliation, because of what she said was done to her in Court. Again, second handed Client sharing for a case not assigned your desk or Office.
What a team Judge Avera and Chandra Snyder make. He read the seized AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS, a day after or the day of the Trial as it is a Point in Fact Avera declared DHS jurisdiction over the matter after the Trial commenced and did proceed to SUMMON Marilyn LeBaron to PERSONNALLY APPEAR shortly after ten days had passed. So, the legally inclined should wonder if that is a RULE 53 move or it that is an automatic MOTOIN available to the judge, because I don’t think the CPS Agent is inclined to identify a jurisdictional argument or if they read the MOTOION and then said, “We better get her to a Dependency hearing”, now that the Trial is over, by so, present a MOTION, after the meeting to veto Nicole K Halls reconciliation plans, without replacing her as Advocate, too, so they could have Judge Avera validate ‘them’, and have him declare, “Yes, I see the STRAW MAN here, “I find DHS has jurisdiction”, once and twice into court record at a dependency / pseudo sentencing herring, but keeping the muted Caseworker, but assign to her a pen kept in the inkwell somewhere at the DHS Office, ordering, again by second hand, the representation of DHS Staff as the protected, allowing the supervisory veto to go forward as a “No Contact Order”. So in the end, Nicole K. Hall was never really Melanie’s true Advocate, and has no Power to Appeal, because a judge should not, and has no Power to argue her own opinion but is instructed what her Attestation is therefore having no real power in her pen, just limited to do the will of whoever took offence in support of Chandra Snyder’s allegation regarding her will when subject to verbal objections from the non-defendant as DISHONOR to Marilyn LeBaron, which actually DISHONOR to the American flag.
Max R. Wall’s visualization of the future, whoever else was involved in the non-clinical diagnosis, and Nicole K. Hall’s vacant signature, said late jurisdiction hearing, is a demonstration of bias considering the Chandra Snyder sized Melanie’s right to the Security of her Papers preventing her signature upon the AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS, which would have empower her mother’s dormant pen, where in said motion Melanie’s mother attested Melanie had demanded a lawyer, and was threatening to bring a claim against the State of Oregon. But, then again Melanie’s representation was split between Max R Wall and everybody else but Nicole K. Hall, so the seer of Polk County Court superseded Marilyn LeBaron account of actual events. That attestation would have proved there was a conflict on interest between her and the woman that seized the document Marilyn LeBaron filed upon each involved party as required she do. Moreover, due to the fact that Max R. Wall ‘represented’ Melanie’s mother as well as Melanie, both by second hand, had split his duties as Counsel or Advisor to Melanie with the DHS, making the State of Oregon’s interests in promoting the gain of pharmaceutical up sell his Client in Fact, leaving his primary objective within such a duo second handed ‘Client relationship’ without the equal protection of the PRC in all three directions, when including the interests of the ‘State of Oregon’, Max R. Wall, not being subject thereto according to the Oregon State Bar. Further out, next to the fact that there is no right to have your whole case tried before a jury of our peers the US and Oregon State Constitution is circumvented on the mass, since lousy parenting is not a crime, and an investigation called an assessment having all the definitions of our Due Process rights circumvented in the OAR, replaced by new definitions, and a venue changed into noncrime, which circumvents all the right to equal protection of Counsel of Choice while the bureaucrat becomes the parent of all, and gets to look over the shoulders of everybody else, too, including that of God. Considering the value of the American Due Process rights, and considering the value ‘We the People’ place on our children, in comparison Administrative Judges do not value the place of the parent, at least not very much when a bureaucrat can condemned our bloodline and then the seer of the court can condemned our future behavior. Congruent to the Supreme Court Rule which has shown they don’t care that we have a bloodline or the right to have our seed protected and put in line for an inheritance, when paternal parents are deemed unfit, giving foster parents the advantage or at least equal footing as contenders for custody when consideration as adoptive placement next to grandparents is given. We should all seriously consider this in light that, in the case, Melanie LeBaron ‘a Child’, the Juvenile Department, 7163-J, who was not assigned a case to work at the time of giving orders about her placement, had condemned her mother’s bloodline after previously arranging, without telling Marilyn LeBaron, a DHS caseworker would be attend at her daughter’s meeting with him, which was directed at the mother instead of the child, which tied in the Independence Police Department as well, because they violated Melanie’s right to a Speedy Trial on something else, then used it like a lasso with a slip knot to loop her mother in. But, the caseworker, the future non-client of Max R. Wall’s Future Prognosis, attended that meeting late for an assessment with no supervisory extensions in the Exhibit against the adversely affected. PRESENTMENT of that which is not authorized by the OAR in the form of questions is confusing to the subject and not proper. Since, better late than never is not better than not being there at all, after she said “Police are not needed”, seems to be the mode of operation, never mind the game of leap frog that gets played at a later date after the completion of the belated report, and the close of a case. See: Valentines Day 2005. And to that I add Mat L. Hawkins of the Juvenile Department, who once attested Melanie had not been abused by her mother, wanted the DHS to find some teeth but said they had none, but, the DHS continued to make demands on a closed case anyway, both of which happened after his Attestation Melanie had suffered from third party abuses, but not at home. Which gets us back to Chandra Snyder and he conflict of interest between her and Melanie LeBaron. Well to that I say, “If it ‘Takes a whole village to raise a child’, now any body in the collective Foster Village is a candidate to be an adoptive parent’ especially since a foster parent is the only option the CPS Caseworker has as placement according to Statute. And to that I ask, what is the zip code of ‘THE WHOLE VILLAGE’, and did that village sprout up around ‘a Castle’? An with bureaucrats condemning the bloodline of any given parent without proper DNA screening or access to the Privilege with the doctor, a power struggle for the Privilege Information should be a hot topic at this point and goes to the Point in Fact that there is not actual complaint documented, just the mere fact that a relationship with a doctor exists. We must object or every body will be a slave to their doctor and become a gunny pig, and the whole world a clinic. That power struggle is surrounded around our right to privacy and freedom of religion. Therefore we must at least seek to uphold Separation of Powers, especially when parents have no Privileged relationship with respect to the State of Oregon, the Municipal Police, or the DHS, which is unconstitutional in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment pursuant to the Point in Fact that being denied all our Privileged relationship is the equivalent of being equity, treated as though we are property of the ‘State of Oregon’. In example, how could a chair have Privilege with a lawyer or a doctor, or have an attachment to offspring for that matter? In conclusion, ‘We the People’ are not property, but Sovereign unto God, which no Contractual agreement should sever, Separation of Powers is the key to this argument, because a proper investigation includes incommunicado which is supposed to happen at the earliest stage, but cannot when there is not Privilege to speak of, especially when Psychology the Wild card is the only law left, and a child is being robbed of her freedom of religion, which is a matter of Sanctioned Prejudice, but not a matter for the State or an iron clad grip of pseudo parenting of parents, since children have their pen assigned to their parents until they turn eighteen. So, instead of opening my Bible should I open the ORS and start reading it to my offspring? Because there seems to be no room for God here, in this pseudo secular godhood granted to the opinion of the prognosis.
Also, pursuant to the Sixth Amendment right, and the right to rebut an allegation at the earliest stage of an assessment, the demands placed upon Marilyn LeBaron’s PERSON were in the written format, but made on a closed case, with the disposition of UNABLE TO DETERMINE, were Chandra Snyder was not authorized by the OAR to send such demands, and also refused the parent the evidence, a grievance process, and access to the attestation from the witnesses though that witness was not attainable for cross-examination, nor was the timeline of events established to link relevancy. So all that is left is a violation of the inference upon inference rule, while CPS Agents taught their authoritative position as Social Service Experts, proving “Just say, ‘Yes Massa”’, is the only rule of thumb, they full knowing it is to be REASONALBLE EXPECTED, in Polk County, since RULE 53, can allow Partial Cross Consolidation between two separate venues, At Law and AT LAW, crime and noncrime, and turn you into a criminal for committing a lesser non ticket able parenting offense, so non punishment turns out to innonfit the non sentence, since it is preventive, so why the arduous prolonged separation tactics and all the condemnation? Chandra Snyder did in fact make her future premise known, but on the other hand, she would not otherwise allow for PRESENTMENT or a REBUTAL of the same because the case was closed and refused to answer the volumes of the letters sent to the DHS office. Said letter of intimidation is in Exhibit for the Custody Case, Singleton Vs. LeBaron, 05P2176 and 05P2064, Judge Horner, Polk County Circuit Court. Marilyn LeBaron to receive any and all demands, which are called ‘Letters of Expectation’, after a case is FOUNDED is contingent upon timely Due Notice, mailed by CERTIFIED MAIL according to the OAR, but the one that came did not contain all applicable ORS and OAR pursuant to a Summary of Points Raised and Authorities Relied Upon. But, DHS cited a Judge that FOUNDED, the UNABLE TO DETERMINE, disposition and he has no RULE OF COURT to do so, since the Judge is not an assess-t-gative body, e-hem, the Judge is not the assessor, nor do the OAR allow for the case to be upgraded after the case is closed so he is out of line and Polk County Liable, for his lack of adhesion to his Cannon. He not appointing Proper Counsel to Marilyn LeBaron, when he demanded to hear from the DHS is the equivalent of assigning the case and then taking the seat of the DA and ordering him to skip the Petition, and just send in the rap sheet, or judicial report, he would be accustomed to getting if a Petition had been filed by DHS. But, no, he left the Parent to study law, Law, and all the OAR, and all the ORS, and all the RULES OF COURT, only to ignore the Attestations that Thomas Alexander Bleu LeBaron wanted to come back to his established home, which was entered into record by favored party, hence, “No Complaint, No Victim”, not a contractual law term, belonging in Crime and Punishment & the Justice System, so the State of Oregon is the only, officially named victim at a later date, Judge Horner the leader of a lynch mob to be offended by the words, “Get a Search Warrant” due to Marilyn LeBaron reading the OAR all by herself, without Counsel of Choice to help her. So in essence, the fact that the DHS had ‘No Teeth’, they delayed the Court Process while just looking for a reason to take a bite, but in lieu of their own teeth used Judge Horner as a set of falsies, which Judge Avera recognized in that he did not include that point in his JUDGMENT, including only the condemnation instigated at the Juvenile Department. In the meantime there was no way to examine relevancy and make objections without duress, and lawyers were asking for retainer agreements up to $10, 000. While Judge Horner included the ‘State of Oregon’, as an involved party after Judge Luukinen, when applying RULE 53, said, ‘Get a lawyer or get a broken arm’ when the Child Custody Case 05P2064 / O5P2176 was denied the Partial Cross Consolidation Marilyn LeBaron requested. Instead of upholding the right to face the State of Oregon that request was denied because of a tiny word ‘in’, which produced the first violation of the Right to a SPEEDY TRIAL for the matters that pertain to Thomas Alexander Bleu LeBaron, and proves we have no right to Counsel at all, being that Judge Horner ORDERED to hear from the DHS and did not appoint Thomas Alexander Bleu LeBaron or either his parents Counsel of any kind when he finally decided he was going to make Marilyn LeBaron read a judicial report from them, but not face them, which circumvents that which is ORDER pursuant to the OAR, in that DHS had not filed a Petition of there own. But, Judge Horner DEMANDED to he wanted a report, though three months late did he do so. I guess, it does not matter that the opposing party did not require they show and that Judge Sullivan forwarded the MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE, though Judge Luukinen said, “No Facing The DHS” at the time of CONSOLIDATION. Now, including the two sets of DOUBLE CONTINUANCES granted Max R. Wall while DHS tried to figure out what they wanted to do with all the Exhibits mailed to them ‘sort of funny’, I’d say Judge Horner has to go crawl up into Judge Avera’s lap and say, “I told you so”, and so did our prophet”! But, if he does one should consider Judge Avera did not allow him to on the point in Petition III where DHS had insinuated that he could. Now all that remains is, “Go do what Judge Avera ORDERED, even against your right to Privacy, and Doctor Patient Privilege, or the DHS will come and take your grandchildren, too. Said custody dispute came before Polk County Court, under the opposing parties duress filled actions, with letters form DHS in hand, that were admitted into record, but, they had not had a legal assessment completed within the limitations of the OAR, and said letters should not have mailed out in the first place nor provide for RULE 53, though a popular move in Polk County, as Partial Cross Consolidation between Criminal Prosecution and Noncriminal matters, one having bearing on he other, but not applicable if between two cases when the citizen MOTIONS for it to allow for a new judge to be appointed in the case were DHS may prejudice the former. But, instead two cases squished together not subject to proper presentment is what commenced and not a complete CONSOLIDATION, where the Substantive Due Process right is circumvented, and objections struck thereto, a show of disregard to the Oath of Office, when the example used by Judge Luukinen could have been followed, and used to QUASH DHS allegation. But, instead it is used to oppress the Fifth Amendment and delay the complaint of a citizen against a bureaucrat who misused RULE 53, to tip the scale in one case to build the other, while assessing. Said, complaint is FOUNDED in the ORS, where Zachariah Singleton is not Melanie LeBaron’s father and not allowed Privilege, therefore, being late, DHS was prohibited from disclosure over the facts of her activity, which had no bearing on Thomas Alexander Bleu LeBaron, so in lieu of Teeth on any matter, the fax sent out was unauthorized. Which is where Chandra Snyder is the blame because she continued a closed case all the way to into Petition III in support of her subordinate where no documentation of supervisory extensions was documented properly or in Exhibit. Thereto, while I sought to complain about Judge Horner, and his sanctioned preset disposition, all I got from on Civil Rights lawyer is, “Well, it’s his courtroom”, and a improper diagnosis accompanied by conjecture as punishment. Proper Counsel pursuant to UCC 1-207, my right to a rebuttal at the earliest stage of an investigation / assessment, {‘asses-ti-gation’}, accomplished with police involvement, could have offered order to this matter, but, in violation of the OAR since there is not rule that allows for the upgrading of a disposition from UNABLE TO DETERMINE to FOUNDED, DHS activity is mute on its face. Judge Horner had no grounds to ORDER to hear from the DHS, or the DHS cite Horner without presenting a case for Adjudication, even if he wanted to hear from them any reports would have been inappropriate and QUASHABLE. But, all those arguments were completely left in the sideline because Judge Horner, knew the case was closed and assigned DHS to represent the Thomas Alexander Bleu LeBaron anyway, and not granting lawyers to the parent in question, while Marilyn LeBaron, barred from placing evidence into the record, has grounds to negate the responsibility to have to go bring DHS to Court herself, when she is the subject and they the opposing party. Furthermore out of order, since she asked for discovery and that was denied, too, as well as not allowed to cross-examine the comments made by her opponent over the Exhibited letters from the DHS, which were placed into court record. She was shut down, Judge Horner saying, “What does that got to do with this?”, even before he ORDERED it now would. At every turn the right to face the allegation and offer a rebuttal was denied by Polk County Court Judges, who seem to be dependent on the opinion of an Agency before they ever actually had on to share on the matter.
Finally, I will not speak to any CPS Agent in PERSON again, as DHS cannot prepare my documents giving Legal Advise, not my Counsel of Choice, and next to the Point in Fact that DHS Agents hold no license to practice law, their intended ‘Client relationships’ are both left without Constitutional representation, protection of the PRC, or a Plea Bargain available to offer parents. In that the ORS, is not a law firm, it extends no Power of Attorney unless the contract bears your signature, but your offspring is where that contract directs the conflict of contractual agreements, because, who in this nation is aware, Fully Advised on the Premise that Legal illiteracy is has prevented parents from noticing their not named as a respondent, subject to the relief sought by DHS, when DHS only intend to relieve them of parenthood, yet assessed and not accused, in the Petitions filed upon the Court. Furthermore, DHS and all CPS Agents are not legally qualified to give Legal Advice pursuant to equal protection of the PRC, which is not possible for ‘a Child’, which would dictate the lack of a retainer agreement between the CPS Agent which is circumvented by the ORS which declares the CPS Agent the Child Advocate, unless you cite the whole ORS in haste, making the DMV is a noncriminal prosecutory law firm sanctioned and designed to circumvent the right to Counsel of Choice. People are coerced by the Municipal Police on the mass to enter into that Municipal agreement or they get thrown into jail. Nearer to the point, since it is not plausible or possible that there be a retainer agreement by and between the CPS Agent, the child and the parent, too, not even at the DMV, because even Legal Aid can identify a conflict of interest and will deny the opposing party representation. So, the DMV should not get to tell the parent and the child who their Counsel is, especially one that is called ‘a Child Advocate’ and has judicial powers, too, while forcing parents to attend Family Unity Meetings, which is a prolonged and compounded sanctioned conflict of interest, but would not be rectified even if the Nature of Representation was declared directly to the Child, because the Child has no contract with the DMV, or capable of comprehending such a concept. If not subject to contractual settlement attempts prior to the trial at noncriminal matters, which severs parents of their every Privileged relationship. Needless to say, Melanie LeBaron was not born under Marriage Licensing Agreements and not property, so entitled to Privileged relationships. But, due to the fact that the DA is also pre-retained as the voice of the people to enforce an action at non criminal law, and leaves all parties involved unprotected by Constitutional Privilege Client relationship guarded by the PRC, and the child without a Defender for his or her right to his inheritance, both legal and genealogy, like Melanie LeBaron was, all parties but the State of Oregon, who is not entitled, which has no right to an inheritance or power to assign a contract agreement over a party not holding a Driver’s License, hence again, Melanie LeBaron had a right to Counsel of Choice since not deemed property of the State of Oregon. The uninhabitable, the contractual agreement is the DA’s true Client, because the DHS is the Agent of the State of Oregon.
There should be the equivalent of being read the Miranda Warning when considering the extended length a child is detained in foster care and the parent subject to DHS control and a child’s stay in care should be deemed the equivalent of ‘house arrest’. In opposite, with respect to the Point in Fact that parental avowal is not subject to the protection of Miranda warning, in the sense that the DHS intend to use what the parent say against them, wherein the fact that suspicion is the consequence if the parent is to ‘remain silent’, and the conclusion of ‘guilty’ even were there is no Plea attached to the initial Probable Cause, which is a declaration of a stressor, which was irrelevant to their assertions after the second set of double CONTINUANCES. The DA adding the reason for their future case, which could not have been FOUNDED until the case was actually tried and Marilyn LeBaron found guilty of a crime. So, innocent until proven guilty is no longer due to ‘Psychology the Wild Card’, if compared to the rules of a limited search warrant, they were late in declaring their Premise anyway, which not purported until after the first set of double CONTINUANCES upon review of Colombo style communication in Exhibit with no questions asked to her by anyone. Said conflict of interest is compounded into collusion especially when a conflict of interest between the a Child and CPS Agent automatically exists, which produces a conflict of theories at law regarding the application or the term ‘Reasonable Doubt’ and the term ‘Innocent Until Proven Guilty’, which should become ‘Condemned Until Proven Competent’, but let us come up with some disease first, which is not due here, or even application of the REASONABLE EFFORTS clauses being effectual as a default judgment, and the burden of proof in this case shifted, without actual cause. And the clear message heard in this case is, ‘Show proof of obedience of doctors orders’ or you get no parent child relationship, but, let us diagnose you first, and until you do I am your only nonprivilege. In effect treating the parent as property, and more so that their offspring, because the CPS Agent will honor the right to her Privilege with her client, and so will the Governor’s Advocacy Office, the DHS boomerang, misrepresented as an Ombudsman’s Office.
The future of our children’s outcome is the government’s property, against the fact that Commercial Destruction of this Planet has the constant rebuttal to complaints against cancer causing emotions, the future outcome of this planed it not sanctioned as a cause for action though value is attached to Land, like the equity attached to the child and the expense of juvenile crime on the taxpayer. So there is a conflict of theories, were preventive remedy had become law, whereas a child is a commodity, and the consumed world produces now for his destroyer, both a resource subject to regulation. So, why not allow ‘a Child’ a suet in the BEST INTEREST, of ‘a Children’s’ future world, which has been barred from court action, as well as the both the unborn in this story in both venues of law?
So, that which is not subject to a contract yet, or even the Right to Life, has no right to cry from the womb, to protect its planet, even while God is knitting. Thereto, Judicial discretion should not be overlooked after dissertations can be written upon the conflicts of laws they produce. Next to that, what would be the limitations of the unborn voice with respect to Melanie LeBaron, ‘a Children’, as Max R. Wall entitled her in one of his motions? “I’m not under your jurisdiction yet!’ ‘I don’t have a Social Security Number, or a Driver’s License, and I don’t even have the right to be born so how can I enter into an agreement if there is possibility to stipulate the beginning or termination of said contract, or terms of agreement enumerated by us, for us’, or between me and my mother to be’, ‘You have too many Clients already, and I need to meet my grandmother before I decide where to log your expected complaints about her!’ ‘Besides, If I am born with the same condemnation the Juvenile Department imposed as defective blood, with respect to my great grandpa, I am only going to be a disappointment to anybody else who notices, so why don’t you just let us stay together, we will understand each other, and since, as Mat L. Hawkins said, it is inherited, we won’t even notice, like you do’, ‘We will be accustomed to each other’, ‘We will be so much alike I will feel accepted and valued just the way I am’, ‘Oh, Leave me alone!’ ‘I am Sovereign unto God, and He decides if I am cursed or blessed according the Scripture and He is the Author of my DNA’, ‘I am in his hand, so non of you represent me and cannot be retained because I cannot be enumerated as a party to an action if I have no agreement with the State of Oregon, as of yet, especially if you declare a complaint to gain another client whereas I declare a conflict of interest like Judge Horner did to my mom and my grandma’, ‘He appointing the same law firm and then reassigning CASA in lieu of a Proper Defense, an indication that he declared a conflict of interest after he declared my and my mother co-complainant against the State of Oregon’, ‘Besides, a law firm cannot represent both sided of the arguments’, while they benefit directly form starting the complaint process’, ‘A conflict of interest will exist between both your intended clients, if you follow Horner’s example, appoint a client at the other end of the argument unto the same psudo firm’, ‘both my mom and me have a right to our own lawyer, after Horner’s example’, ‘I can not be retained’, ‘because you cannot represent another complaint when you’re the only one there to raise the objection’, Not only that, but, because I have no rights to ‘Life, ‘Liberty’, or the ‘Pursuit of Happiness’ yet, you have not grounds to claim jurisdiction over any right to be upheld on behalf of a voice I don’t have until I get to the whatever hospital I am born in, and my mother signs away that which was born Sovereign unto God’, ‘So, pharmaceutical companies and there profit margins cant dictate that I be a consumer of their products yet, not just yet’, ‘So, at least wait till I take my first breath, and my own diagnosis, before you say you speak for me’, ‘I have no benefit of any kind, nor do I have a Straw Man from were you can assess a nonclaim, and nothing to gain from a conflict of interest compounded on two directions from where my mother stands’, ‘We have no Privilege’, ‘I’m going to need an Civil Right Lawyer, as soon as I get out of this place, which is what my grandma will say on my behalf, and she has more to say for me that you do!’”
How is the Supreme Court, in either of the two venues to gain jurisdiction over that which has been abandoned it’s authority of protection and deemed the ‘Undamaged’, ‘The Nonadjoined’, with no right to an no action at law due to “No Complaint Audible, No Right Enumerated” as the discarded fetus, that which has no right unto itself to propel the inevitable into existence, as if the law of predictability did not apply in a prognosis of an obviously unrecognized prophecy that keeps coming true over and over again, ‘In every century’. Why has not some clever lawyer or scientist invented a scientific definition like the law of gravity, by Isaac Newton, to protect the unborn and the right to eminent force? Is ignored concept of the birth of every human being not more obvious than gravity? But, like unto that which has disregarded its sanctity, evolutionary science cannot document or explained how the birth process began, or what force propelled it into existence, from the first conception, because humans do not divide like the amoeba, nor is the first contraction documentable, or if painful relations evolved into pleasure to guard the survival of the fittest ideology? And in ‘honor’, of one of our Presidents, who said in his own defense, “That depends of the definition of sex, which shows if it has not been defined it is not a judiciable topic. Thereto, what definition has been enumerated that did not include the work of the Sovereign hand? Like in the applicable use of the definition for Marriage, which President Bush he got in the wrong direction when he raised the promise of a Constitutional Amendment to define Marriage between a man and a woman, because all the State does is exclude God, impose itself, and claim your offspring its property, which is a contractual agreement, like that to Domestic Partnerships, which is what people objected to and missed the most important point, never mind the one missed by the President of the United States of America. But, with regard to eminent force, it does not take a prophecy to say which way a ball will bounce, but it does take a backwards thinking mind to confuse the laws of God, because the theories of evolution seem to preach that which has not been defined, but only define change as he only law to which all things are united by the same probability. Yet the eminent force of birth, which is even more constant than the evidence of change, but has not been sanctioned due to the promise that future variables are its only definitive parameter, and in contempt of that witch, is unmovable. Said evolutionary promise to change, is constantly the only constant in the theory of evolution, and in defiance of that which exists and existed and will always be, which is an unattested and undocumented, hypothesis because no body lived ‘anytime all those centuries ago’, to document all the changes’, and contrary to its competing theory, who has not been honored as the giver of life, though a law of, ‘I will be born’, is without a doubt present, and has been left to invent its own definition preventing man to honor a precept subject to holy regulation and judgments, which are called Statutes, even to God, because both the laws of gravity and buoyancy are in effect and predictable, both defined and applicable as cause and effect in relationship the physical world. Yet, but both can not be labeled, as an Exhibit, because one is honored, as physical evidence and one is honored as cause and effect, from whence we can draw logical conclusions form a given set of parameters, of which neither should be premonition. Hence the word expectant is attached to that which is loved, and not valued unless wanted? Yet, on the other hand, what if the Very Protected was scheduled for an abortion and Max R. Wall’s prophecy came true? What would Marilyn LeBaron’s, arraignment look like? Or for another point of reference, like for instance, from the first unborn to be included in this history of events, which has not right, according Supreme Rule to be protected under contractual law, how could Max R. Wall be assigned to it’s representation to be protected under that jurisdiction in which the mother intends to extends her control and Max R. Wall has no authority, since Criminal Matters are tried elsewhere, by another Officer, in a separate trial. So, what would the unborn cry from the mother’s womb have been, from the Criminal Justice Systems venue beforehand, if her mother had been assailed, and she was not scheduled to terminate the pregnancy? ‘You just wait till I am born and I’ll get Mark Allen Heslinga to put you in jail so Max R. Wall can declare you guilty today?’ Would the Supreme Court empower the Justice System to apply a proper punishment, bringing justice to that which Max R. Wall had declared without a sound definition in the OAR to do so, or contractual authority to adjoin another party to the action without jurisdiction over the matter her presented? Because if the unborn were a ball, its right to bounce would not have been defined yet therefore not applicable in the which has not been legislated. If the unborn were a ball, and somehow, the definition of eminent force though undeclared compels all the other definitions pertaining to existence has not been defined as a precept subject to Supreme Court Rule, except the part which makes it start bouncing, we would declare it had not right to sit in one place, as if Marry Anne E. Millers unborn had been entered into her contractual agreements because she did not schedule the termination, where as Max R. Wall had leveraged a damaged party before the fact though it had not definable value, unless there is a conflict of laws, and the Supreme Court can have it both ways, “Rock, Paper, Scissors” style being the rule of thumb, in a childlike game, where one play always supersedes the other, depending on the order of the draw. No one can make objections to the outcome, which is the underlying rule of thumb in that game besides those that define the power of the Rock over Scissors, the Paper over Rock, and so forth, each power assigned their station. If Max R. Wall represented the unborn of a CPS Agent, who could hold not position over the grandchild, how did Max R. Wall retain the Power of Attorney over something undefined, which I deem an eminent force, yet not honored by Congress as such, yet deemed as thought assessable and therefore valuable and subject to settlement attempts prior to the Criminal Trial at noncriminal matters. The Office of the DA, congruent to ORS and DHS can have no Privilege with that which has not been defined. So, Max R. Wall overstepped the Supreme Court Rule into religiosity, because, God does enumerate the value of the unborn, when damaged by wrongdoings. Whereas, if the Nature of Representation, if declared, CPS Agents would reveal an equivalent of the Citizen Arrest Powers assigned to the traffic police over ‘We the People’. But, the CPS powers are assigned to all our Privileged relationships, even whereas there is no crime to arrest a parent for, because CPS is about preventing juvenile crime without arraignment, yet a secondary accountability built in to the parents amalgamation, but that Citizens Arrest Power is applied directly over the most privileged and private matters, making CPS the opponent of the parent’s sense of responsibility, circumventing the plea process as in Melanie’s mom’s case. Marilyn LeBaron’s Plea being entered by the Prosecution and her opponent in the form of a prophecy & diagnosis naming a bureaucrat the intended future victim negating the possibility of a plea at the criminal level, extending his Affidavit beyond his venue at law overstepping into Mark Allen Heslinga’s duty and his Oath on Affirmation misplaced and inapplicable, as well as in contempt of God, because I don’t think Max R. Wall quit berating while he wrote his Affidavit, but may have scratched a mirror or two with spit and called upon a slug to fall out of his mouth, so he did not have to lick his own stamp after he put his pen down. Oh, what are the Postal Regulations on intimidating by way of false prophecy? Oh, excuse me, phony prognosis to gain access to the same? Now in that the Nature of Representation, In that the CPS Agents ‘Power’ or ‘Authority’ was the only intended victim even prior to the psudo diagnosis when the mother was arrested when at the criminal level incommunicado should have applied, but did not, the DHS still intend to represent the woman who DHS claim assailed them by closing her front door. At another level, unlike the Municipal Policeman, who acts as, Judge, Complainant, and Prosecutor, the CPS takes more than your money at the County level, whereat the police effect at drop in your bank account at the Municipal level in the form of fines. In that direction, the CPS take your character, which is also your property according to Black’s Law Dictionary, and very valuable indeed, but, add to that, the loss of your character affects your next parent child relationship as well, instead of just your credit and your insurance rates… The CPS Agent is much more empowered that the traffic cop, because in most cases, estimated at 2600 a day out of 3000, CPS Agents are the opponent the child at onset, which indicated the problem is at the judicial level in the Sanctioned Pre Set Disposition Judge Horner revealed when he demanded to hear from the DHS, and said, “What does that have to do with this”, and shut down the cross-examination of the party that should have gone second. Since DHS are not named as a respondent or a party to the action though included as an interested party in custody cases, like in opposite, the parent is not when DHS author a Petition, bringing the conclusion, the State of Oregon is the true Client in all cases at Family Law in all Child Custody Cases and Child Protective Services nationwide. Moreover to the biggest point, where there is a conflict of interest between a CPS Agent and any given parent, like myself, they should not prepare any documents for a parent to sign, which is done under duress since the child is held a hostage while the CPS activity circumvents the ‘right to remain silent’ by the application of REASONABLE EFFORTS, which sort of makes the advise of William Dixon, to remain silent, a risky avenue instead of an option when asserting theories at Due Process at noncriminal matters. Isn’t it like mixing oil and water, crime and noncrime through RULE 53: Hmmmm, so why don’t people have to sign the COMPLAINT and SUMMON when a cop presents a CITATION anymore? Hmmmm, Due Process, minus UCC 1-207, into REASONABLE EFFORTS at noncrime in Family Law while the State Agent claims to be the victim but does not want incommunicado at the criminal level? A parent in essence is put through a confession process in very incriminating Safety Agreements while forcing the pressing of charges and testifying against spouses, and other kinds of agreements; demands for the Release of Information, or by a parent attending referrals to drug and alcohol treatment, parenting or anger management classes, psychological examinations, and all sought against the right to Counsel of Choice in the disclosure of the same, without PRESENTMENT being limited to what actually got them to your door. This leaves the CPS Agent to decide relevancy while they also control all the witnesses testimony, who remain anonymous, completely circumventing the right to rebut or face your accuser and the chance to plead the Fifth Amendment, when giving a release of information to their opponent who intends to speak to the judge for them in court or judicial reports. So what good is a lawyer then when he is not required to attend the meetings or keep a verification of conversation while the WHOLE VILLAGE IS GOSSIPING regarding the propensity for criminal activity of the offspring in any given family? After all the DHS was legislated upon the need to prevent crime and reduce the cost of juvenile criminal activity, which has no bearing on Thomas Alexander Bleu LeBaron, no matter how many times Matt Hawkins read the Book and his big sister answered the clinical questions presented her by him.
All of said confession process is intended by design by those who wrote the ORS, and why would they need to Provide that which is deemed Property of the State of Oregon, when Property has a conservator, not a privileged relationship, and is assessable like all other things of value, where you will find the ‘REASONABLE EFFORTS’ clause equivalent to the Default Judgment, even if the CPS Agent has nothing to offer, so being left alone is not an option at that point, enforced as such at the Judicial Seat as it seems to me, “No Service Available, No Right to Life”, or “No Services Accepted, No Reunification”, which applicable to the message congruent with REASONABLE EFFORTS. This is also adjacent to the fact that, DHS can add to the action as they go, as in this case, due to the allegation of a physical confrontation, because Nicole K. Hall authorized reunification by and between Melanie Victoria and her mother, But, again, the CPS, Child Protective Serviced, became the BPS, Bureaucrat Protective Services. So DHS prognosis for the propensity for criminal behavior is the key here. DHS is supposed to help prevent juvenile crime not detain children from their parents to teach then not to talk back to a bureaucrat when defending against the undermining of the Constitutional, objecting to violations against our flag. And so I say, ‘Just Say’, “Yes, Massa”, if you just do nothing’, because the true Nature of DHS Representation is, ‘all things to all people’, and the Sixth Amendment is inapplicable in that the search warrant happens at the same time as the assessment, whereas the assessment is not limited to what is on the initial call, it grows as it goes against reasonable search and seizure applications in Criminal Justice System prosecution. They can find something else when they get there if not invent something, too. DHS also are judge, complainant, and primary care doctor replacement while referrals are made in any direction, and witness for everybody… etc… all advisory to the Judicial Seat in; Family Law, CPS Action and Child Custody Parenting Time Petitions, because you don’t get to face your assessor even if you request it like Marilyn LeBaron did. Only a Judge, who won’t investigate them, will SUMMON the Assessor, to his ear. No way could this be in the BEST INTERESTS of a Child especially when ‘Psychology the Wild Card’, in the form of false prophecy, seems to be the only law, even in the absence of an actual felony or a history of domestic violence in the home resultant of an improper non clinical diagnosis sought through improper channels, a false Oath of Affirmation, which has caused such a collusive disregard to every good standard of law, of which every point is not quite covered in this legal dissertation. But, please, if you care to get to every point of law circumvented by CPS Agents with their Citizen Arrest Powers assign over your private life start with the “Honorary Arrest Needed”, Marilyn LeBaron’s letter to the Independence Police Department tilled ‘The LeBaron Plea’ and filed in O5P2064, Singleton Vs. LeBaron, Child Custody Case, Polk County Circuit Court before it was partially cross consolidated to 05P2176, because, who goes first was not decided by Judge Luukinen at the time he denied Marilyn LeBaron’s motion to face the DHS. Said custody case in which she was denied the right to face her accuser, again and again, while her objections were stricken, against the Fourteenth Amendment, she being disallowed discovery process and barred by the judge from admitting evidence. Pretty heavy considering that custody case is now subject, according to the RULES OF COURT, to an INVOLUNTARY DISMISS, since the DHS never presented their case as the Judge ORDERED. A secondary QUASH is in order, dictated by the recuse of a judge who ordered to hear from DHS, but, never did until they cited him and took Melanie, retaining her with handcuffs, and brought the cops against the Fifth Amendment Right to back up demands Chandra Snyder made on a closed case, after which they diagnosed their subject, after the first set of DOUBLE CONTINUANCES, and that point was not ruled on by Judge Avera, but his own prejudice became law. During which time some ‘other caseworker’ intimidated the opposing party of said Child Custody Case, while the opposing party did not act though he minded too much at all. Moreover, how the word individual is prized as the overlying agenda for the CPS Agent and cited as such at the bottom of letters containing their letterhead and goes directly to today all the Exhibits, which should be expunged, no matter how irrelevant they were before, considering actual application of the word individual prior to their being outdated or not timely interpreted by the DA, which leaves the, ‘Please Detect the Miracle of God’ assignment to Officer Barlow, assigned to him by Marilyn LeBaron, which boils down to God at Law Vs. Psychology at Court, Freedom of Religion Vs. Psychology the Wild Card, Judge Avera and his false prophet pitted against Marilyn LeBaron’s, God works in mysterious ways, and the little plant which has a leaf she named ‘The Andy Simrin’. So, will ‘Psychology the Wild Card’ supersede every good standard of law even in the form of future prophecy when if the prophecy did actually come true? Well if an expectant mother is not safe in the courtroom, the plea for that criminal matter, would have already been entered and the Courts, which would indeed then have the means for outpatient commitment process? So, how much time does a person spend in the care of a shrink for attacking a pregnant woman? And if the accused refused a Plea of not guilty by reason of mental defect would the Sentencing require prison time? Or would the court have the power to circumvent the refusal of a Plea Bargain of such like they did in Family Law ahead of the fact. Hmmmm. How did the State of Oregon get so much power to throw around calling on the one that ponders over that which is not at all lovely? Well lets look how much is pored into the Pharmaceutical industries advertisement and the bombardment of self help books upon the shelves at the library and the and modern day advertisements asking us to diagnose ourselves and seek a clinician for a prescription… and lets look to the affect that has had upon legislature… and the Municipal Policeman’s job description. Then lets look to the Supreme Court regarding Duress under Social Pressure as grounds to repeal your agreements, as well as the Supreme Court Decision regarding Prejudice as Probable cause. Then to Time Magazine that said the Experts of the day are not ready to say they can condemn anybodies bloodline, just yet. But, all the while it happened in Polk County… So. if the rest of the judiciary of this nation are acting the same, why should I move from Polk County in hopes to have all there of those judges Quashed. So, now I say, ‘It takes a whole nation to keep a bureaucrat of a power trip’, and ‘Just say, “Yes, Massa” if you just do nothing’.
Cordially,

UCC 1-207
Melanie LeBaron
in Propria Persona
Date: 06/08/2007

UCC 1-207
Victoria RD Couvillion
in Propria Persona
Date: 06/08/2007

UCC 1-207
Thomas Alexander Bleu LeBaron
in Propria Persona
Date: 06/08/2007

Endorsed by Marilyn LeBaron, Power of Attorney in Fact assigned over the Affidavit for the above.

UCC 1-207
Marilyn LeBaron
in Propria Persona
Date: 06/08/2007

CC: Gresham Police Department, Sheriff’s Offices, Melanie LeBaron, Marilyn LeBaron, Victoria Couvillion, Lee Warren, Governor’s Advocacy Office,

• By Marilyn LeBaron
• Sunday, June 10th, 2007, 5:33 pm